-
$50M+
a year of legal ad spend, planned and measured
-
about 15 times *
projected return on ad spend, across the ad spend we led
-
200+
law firms whose media Probative has run
* Return on ad spend: the expected attorney-fee value of signed cases divided by ad spend, across the ad spend we led.
Firms are not named, and no places or dates are given. Figures are rounded down.
The numbers, exactly
Probative has led planning and measurement for $50M+ a year in legal ad spend at about 15x projected return on ad spend, and run media for 200+ law firms.
Return on ad spend: the expected attorney-fee value of signed cases divided by ad spend, across the ad spend we led.
Why projected fee value
Contingency practices (injury, workers’ comp, lemon law) value each signed case at projected fee value, because fees arrive months or years later. One survey put the average time to resolve an injury case at about 11.4 months (Nolo), and serious cases take longer. A return measured only on fees already collected would always describe spending from a year or more ago. So each signed case is valued at the attorney fee that similar cases at that firm have historically produced, and the total is divided by all the ad spend on the account, not a hand-picked part of it.
Hourly and flat-fee practices (immigration, family, estate planning, criminal defense, bankruptcy, business) count retained matters and fees billed.
Every case study, strongest results first
Probative’s results, case by case: what the work was, what changed, and a link to each full case study.
| Client | What it was | What changed |
|---|---|---|
| Personal injuryFirm A, an injury firm | Injury firm ties its campaigns to signed cases and earns about 15x projected return on ad spend (case study) |
|
| Lemon lawNew practice | Lemon-law firm built from the ground up passes 100 signed cases a month (case study) |
|
| Lemon lawConsumer-side practice | Lemon-law firm screens for eligibility and automates its follow-up (case study) |
|
| ImmigrationBilingual practice | Immigration firm separates its services, leads with Spanish pages and follows up faster (case study) |
|
| Personal injuryPlaintiff practice | Injury firm tightens its targeting and answers more of its calls (case study) |
|
| Employment lawPlaintiff-side practice | Employment firm targets priority claims, screens inquiries and speeds up attorney review (case study) |
|
| Legal servicesLegal-services business | A legal-services launch cuts what each new client costs in half (case study) |
|
| Personal injuryPlaintiff practice | Injury firm builds a second market and relies less on referrals (case study) |
|
| Employment lawPlaintiff-side practice | Employment firm gives each claim type its own campaign, page and budget (case study) |
|
| Personal injuryPlaintiff practice | Injury firm adds case-type pages, sends signed cases back to Google and staffs Spanish intake (case study) |
|
| Personal injuryPortfolio of injury firms | An injury-firm portfolio, all measured on one signed-case standard (case study) |
|
| Employment lawNew plaintiff-side practice | New employment firm launches with a narrow focus (case study) |
|
Clients are not named. Figures come from each firm’s own records, rounded.
How to read it
- Nothing is adjusted upward. Every figure comes from the firm’s own records and is rounded; the headline record is rounded down.
- One method. Results follow The Probative Standard and the method on how we report.