Market data
Mass torts in Arizona: market data
What public records say about the market for mass torts in Arizona: how much demand the courts and agencies count, how many law offices serve it, how many people need help in Spanish, and the ad rules that apply. Every number links to the record it comes from.
Demand: what courts and agencies count
Counts of filings, crashes, complaints and enforcement in the records each agency keeps. A count shows where problems were recorded, not how many people will hire a lawyer.
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation | 1,791 cases filed, fiscal year | FY2025 | Arizona state | federal-filings-county v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628 record federal-filings-county:AZ · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: product liability | 52 cases filed, fiscal year | FY2025 | Arizona state | federal-filings-county v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628 record federal-filings-county:AZ · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Federal civil filings: private other personal injury (includes product liability, drug and device cases) | 2,206 cases filed, 12 months | 12 months ending 2026-06-30 | District of Arizona federal district | civil-filings v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720009 record cf-az-priv-other-pi · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Federal civil cases filed: cases in a multidistrict litigation (mdl) | 2,419 cases filed, three fiscal years | FY2023-2025 | District of Arizona federal district | idb-civil v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969 record idb-az-mdl · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Federal civil cases filed: product liability and mass tort | 127 cases filed, three fiscal years | FY2023-2025 | District of Arizona federal district | idb-civil v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969 record idb-az-product-liability · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2570: Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability… | 6,470 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2570 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2666: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation | 8,424 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2666 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2738: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products… | 69,340 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2738 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2789: Proton-Pump Inhibitor Products Liability Litigation (No. II) | 11,404 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2789 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2846: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation | 23,324 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2846 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2873: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation | 15,264 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2873 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2974: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation | 4,224 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2974 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3004: Paraquat Products Liability Litigation | 6,602 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3004 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3060: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation | 12,381 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3060 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3081: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation | 4,140 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3081 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3094: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation | 4,025 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3094 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3140: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation | 6,412 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3140 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
Rising or falling
The change between the last two periods each source publishes. No threshold and no smoothing.
| Measure | Before | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation Arizona · record federal-filings-county:AZ | 570 FY2024 | 1,791 FY2025 | rising (+214.2%) |
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: product liability Arizona · record federal-filings-county:AZ | 36 FY2024 | 52 FY2025 | rising (+44.4%) |
Lawyer supply
How many law offices and lawyers the federal statistics count here.
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New lawyers admitted | 965 lawyers a year | 2025 | Arizona state | bar-pipeline v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721443 record az-bar-pipeline · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Counties under 1 law office per 10,000 residents | 3 counties | 2026-Q1 | Arizona state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Counties with no law office | 1 counties | 2026-Q1 | Arizona state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Residents living in those low-office counties | 8 percent of residents | 2026-Q1 | Arizona state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Employer law firms | 2,995 firms | 2022 | Arizona state | law-firm-economy v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997 record lfe-az-all · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Receipts of employer law firms | 4,410,454,000 US dollars | 2022 | Arizona state | law-firm-economy v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997 record lfe-az-all · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Law offices per 10,000 residents | 5.15 per 10,000 residents | 2026-Q1 | Arizona state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Self-employed lawyers (nonemployer firms) | 4,787 firms | latest Nonemployer Statistics year | Arizona state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Private law offices | 3,928 establishments | 2026-Q1 | Arizona state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-04 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Lawyers employed (wage-earning, BLS OEWS) | 11,640 jobs | May 2025 | Arizona state | lawyer-wages v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840 record lawyer-wages:AZ:231011:2025 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Median annual wage of employed lawyers | 134,260 US dollars a year | May 2025 | Arizona state | lawyer-wages v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840 record lawyer-wages:AZ:231011:2025 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
Counties with the most demand per law office
Of the 25 counties in Arizona with the most federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation, the ten with the most per private law office. Both counts are shown with their records.
| County | Demand | Law offices | Per office |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinal County, AZ | 2 record federal-filings-county:04021 | 42 record law-offices-04021 | 0.05 |
| Mohave County, AZ | 1 record federal-filings-county:04015 | 47 record law-offices-04015 | 0.02 |
| Yuma County, AZ | 1 record federal-filings-county:04027 | 50 record law-offices-04027 | 0.02 |
| Maricopa County, AZ | 25 record federal-filings-county:04013 | 2,783 record law-offices-04013 | 0.01 |
| Pima County, AZ | 1 record federal-filings-county:04019 | 498 record law-offices-04019 | 0 |
| Apache County, AZ | 0 record federal-filings-county:04001 | 6 record law-offices-04001 | 0 |
| Cochise County, AZ | 0 record federal-filings-county:04003 | 17 record law-offices-04003 | 0 |
| Coconino County, AZ | 0 record federal-filings-county:04005 | 56 record law-offices-04005 | 0 |
| Gila County, AZ | 0 record federal-filings-county:04007 | 17 record law-offices-04007 | 0 |
| Graham County, AZ | 0 record federal-filings-county:04009 | 6 record law-offices-04009 | 0 |
Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation (federal-filings-county v1.0.0, FY2025) ÷ Private law offices (law-offices v1.0.0, 2026-Q1). ratio = federal-filings-county.ffc.mdl / law-offices.qcew_estabs, rounded to 2 decimals; ranked highest first, among the 25 units with the most demand. Units with zero supply are listed apart (ratio undefined); units without a published value are listed as missing.
Spanish-language demand
People who speak Spanish and speak English less than very well, and the lawyers who speak Spanish, from the Census Bureau survey (with margins of error).
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawyers who speak Spanish at home (ACS) | 1,729 ±388 lawyers | 2020-2024 | Arizona state | language v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758 record language:state:AZ:lawyers-spanish · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Spanish speakers with limited English per Spanish-speaking lawyer | 253 ±56.8 people per lawyer | 2020-2024 | Arizona state | language v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758 record language:state:AZ:lep-per-spanish-lawyer · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Spanish speakers with limited English (ACS) | 436,583 ±6,392 people age 5+ | 2020-2024 | Arizona state | language v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758 record language:state:AZ:spanish-lep · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Spanish speakers with limited English | 436,583 ±7,242 people age 5+ | 2020-2024 | Arizona state | legal-need v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23741886 record legal-need-az · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
Ad rules that apply
The rules a law firm's ads in Arizona have to meet, summarized from the official texts. The full rules, with quotes, are on the state page.
| Topic | Status | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Ad filing or review | P primary source | No filing or pre-approval of ads is required. The State Bar says it does not have to review ads first, though a voluntary review is available. Keeping copies is not required but is called a good idea. ERs 7.1-7.5 contain no filing clause. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Required content | P primary source | Any communication about a lawyer's services must include the name and contact information of at least one lawyer or law firm responsible for its content (ER 7.1(c)). Contact information can be an address, website, phone number or email. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Waiting periods for contact | P primary source | The rules set no waiting period. ER 7.3 bans live person-to-person solicitation for pay, with exceptions, and does not bar mail or email. A statute makes unlawful solicitation of a tort victim at the scene of an accident a class 1 misdemeanor (A.R.S. 13-2924). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Claims and results | P primary source | A lawyer may not make a false or misleading communication (ER 7.1). A lawyer may not state or imply being a certified specialist unless the lawyer meets Supreme Court Rule 44 (ER 7.1(b)); the bar says 'specialize' is allowed if true. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Paying for referrals | P primary source | ER 7.2 is reserved, so Arizona has no rule banning payment for a recommendation. The State Bar says lawyers may now pay referral fees to anyone, but cannot thank a referral source without the client's informed consent. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Call recording | P primary source | Arizona makes it a felony to intercept a wire or electronic communication to which one is not a party without the consent of either the sender or the receiver, so one participant's consent suffices. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Texting | P primary source | A seller or solicitor may not make a solicitation call or send a solicitation text to a number on the national do-not-call registry. A violation is an unlawful practice under A.R.S. official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Drug and device injury ads (state statute) | D default rule | [object Object] |
| Ad filing or review | P primary source | Arizona: no filing or review of lawyer ads is required. official source · filing v1.2.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721409 · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Paying for referrals | P primary source | Only two or more firms jointly working on a matter may divide a client's fee; the firms must tell the client in writing how the fee will be divided and how responsibility will be divided, and the division of responsibility must be reasonable. official source · referral v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23747113 · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Limitation period | P primary source | Arizona, personal injury: two years, under A.R.S. § 12-542(1), as read in the official code on 2026-10-28. official source · limitations v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23743673 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Limitation period | P primary source | Arizona, product liability: within the period prescribed in section 12-542 (two years), under A.R.S. § 12-551, as read in the official code on 2026-10-28. official source · limitations v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23743673 · checked 2026-10-28 |
Prices and pay (national)
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobs in legal services (seasonally adjusted) | 1,249 thousand jobs | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:CES6054110001:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| CPI-U: legal services | 230 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:CUUR0000SEGC01:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| PPI: offices of lawyers | 338 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:PCU541110541110:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| PPI: civil negligence legal services | 257 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:PCU5411105411103:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
What is missing
Datasets linked to this practice that have no figure here, and values the source withholds. We never fill these in.
- findings (demand): the dataset has no records for Arizona (it covers other places)
- firm-web-census (supply): the dataset has no records for Arizona (it covers other places)
Download and cite
The rows behind this page, with every dataset, version, DOI, record id and check date.
Cite as: Probative Growth, The new-lawyer pipeline by jurisdiction: bar exam pass rates and new admissions, 2025 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721443); Federal civil filings by nature of suit and district, 12-month periods since 2018 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720009); Legal deserts: law offices and lawyers per resident in every U.S. county v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430); Federal civil cases filed, by county of the plaintiff's residence, case type and year (Federal Judicial Center) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628); How long federal civil cases take: outcomes, class actions and pro se share by district, nature of suit and year v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969); Spanish-speaking demand vs Spanish-speaking lawyer supply, by state and metro v1.1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758); Law firm size, solos and receipts, by state: Census SUSB 2022, Nonemployer Statistics 2024 and Economic Census 2022 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997); Law offices, jobs and pay by county, with solo-practice counts: BLS QCEW, Census CBP and Nonemployer Statistics v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415); Lawyer, paralegal and legal-staff pay by state and metro (BLS OEWS) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840); Legal need by county: who may need a lawyer, from the American Community Survey v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23741886); Legal-services prices and jobs, monthly (BLS CPI, PPI and CES) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854); Mass-tort docket tracker, federal MDL pending actions by month since 2019 v1.1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737); CC BY 4.0. https://probativegrowth.com/markets/arizona/mass-tort/
Use it in your AI tool
The same answers come from our free MCP server for AI assistants (no account): https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets
How this page is built
Each figure is copied from one record of the dataset named with it, joined to this state and practice through the open practice and place crosswalk. Nothing is estimated. Methods, inputs and limits.