Market data
Mass torts in South Carolina: market data
What public records say about the market for mass torts in South Carolina: how much demand the courts and agencies count, how many law offices serve it, how many people need help in Spanish, and the ad rules that apply. Every number links to the record it comes from.
Demand: what courts and agencies count
Counts of filings, crashes, complaints and enforcement in the records each agency keeps. A count shows where problems were recorded, not how many people will hire a lawyer.
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation | 11,311 cases filed, fiscal year | FY2025 | South Carolina state | federal-filings-county v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628 record federal-filings-county:SC · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: product liability | 60 cases filed, fiscal year | FY2025 | South Carolina state | federal-filings-county v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628 record federal-filings-county:SC · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Federal civil filings: private other personal injury (includes product liability, drug and device cases) | 5,966 cases filed, 12 months | 12 months ending 2026-06-30 | District of South Carolina federal district | civil-filings v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720009 record cf-sc-priv-other-pi · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Federal civil cases filed: cases in a multidistrict litigation (mdl) | 18,341 cases filed, three fiscal years | FY2023-2025 | District of South Carolina federal district | idb-civil v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969 record idb-sc-mdl · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Federal civil cases filed: product liability and mass tort | 237 cases filed, three fiscal years | FY2023-2025 | District of South Carolina federal district | idb-civil v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969 record idb-sc-product-liability · status P · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2570: Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability… | 6,470 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2570 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2666: Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation | 8,424 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2666 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2738: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices and Products… | 69,340 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2738 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2789: Proton-Pump Inhibitor Products Liability Litigation (No. II) | 11,404 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2789 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2846: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation | 23,324 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2846 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2873: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation | 15,264 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2873 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 2974: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation | 4,224 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-2974 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3004: Paraquat Products Liability Litigation | 6,602 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3004 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3060: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation | 12,381 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3060 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3081: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation | 4,140 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3081 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3094: Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) Products Liability Litigation | 4,025 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3094 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Pending actions in MDL 3140: Depo-Provera (Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate) Products Liability Litigation | 6,412 pending actions | as of 2026-10-01 | United States United States | mdl v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737 record mdl-3140 · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
Rising or falling
The change between the last two periods each source publishes. No threshold and no smoothing.
| Measure | Before | Latest | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation South Carolina · record federal-filings-county:SC | 4,121 FY2024 | 11,311 FY2025 | rising (+174.5%) |
| Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: product liability South Carolina · record federal-filings-county:SC | 101 FY2024 | 60 FY2025 | falling (-40.6%) |
Lawyer supply
How many law offices and lawyers the federal statistics count here.
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New lawyers admitted | 701 lawyers a year | 2025 | South Carolina state | bar-pipeline v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721443 record sc-bar-pipeline · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Counties under 1 law office per 10,000 residents | 1 counties | 2026-Q1 | South Carolina state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Counties with no law office | 0 counties | 2026-Q1 | South Carolina state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Residents living in those low-office counties | 0.4 percent of residents | 2026-Q1 | South Carolina state | deserts v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430 record deserts-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Employer law firms | 2,416 firms | 2022 | South Carolina state | law-firm-economy v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997 record lfe-sc-all · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Receipts of employer law firms | 3,629,936,000 US dollars | 2022 | South Carolina state | law-firm-economy v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997 record lfe-sc-all · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Law offices per 10,000 residents | 6.03 per 10,000 residents | 2026-Q1 | South Carolina state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Self-employed lawyers (nonemployer firms) | 3,307 firms | latest Nonemployer Statistics year | South Carolina state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Private law offices | 3,357 establishments | 2026-Q1 | South Carolina state | law-offices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415 record law-offices-45 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Lawyers employed (wage-earning, BLS OEWS) | 7,890 jobs | May 2025 | South Carolina state | lawyer-wages v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840 record lawyer-wages:SC:231011:2025 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Median annual wage of employed lawyers | 120,310 US dollars a year | May 2025 | South Carolina state | lawyer-wages v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840 record lawyer-wages:SC:231011:2025 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
Counties with the most demand per law office
Of the 25 counties in South Carolina with the most federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation, the ten with the most per private law office. Both counts are shown with their records.
| County | Demand | Law offices | Per office |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abbeville County, SC | 22 record federal-filings-county:45001 | 2 record law-offices-45001 | 11 |
| Charleston County, SC | 571 record federal-filings-county:45019 | 550 record law-offices-45019 | 1.04 |
| Union County, SC | 3 record federal-filings-county:45087 | 3 record law-offices-45087 | 1 |
| Laurens County, SC | 5 record federal-filings-county:45059 | 8 record law-offices-45059 | 0.63 |
| Chesterfield County, SC | 4 record federal-filings-county:45025 | 8 record law-offices-45025 | 0.5 |
| Cherokee County, SC | 2 record federal-filings-county:45021 | 8 record law-offices-45021 | 0.25 |
| Kershaw County, SC | 4 record federal-filings-county:45055 | 18 record law-offices-45055 | 0.22 |
| Pickens County, SC | 3 record federal-filings-county:45077 | 16 record law-offices-45077 | 0.19 |
| Lancaster County, SC | 3 record federal-filings-county:45057 | 19 record law-offices-45057 | 0.16 |
| Berkeley County, SC | 10 record federal-filings-county:45015 | 82 record law-offices-45015 | 0.12 |
Federal civil cases filed by county of the plaintiff: cases in a multidistrict litigation (federal-filings-county v1.0.0, FY2025) ÷ Private law offices (law-offices v1.0.0, 2026-Q1). ratio = federal-filings-county.ffc.mdl / law-offices.qcew_estabs, rounded to 2 decimals; ranked highest first, among the 25 units with the most demand. Units with zero supply are listed apart (ratio undefined); units without a published value are listed as missing.
Spanish-language demand
People who speak Spanish and speak English less than very well, and the lawyers who speak Spanish, from the Census Bureau survey (with margins of error).
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spanish speakers with limited English (ACS) | 113,786 ±3,746 people age 5+ | 2020-2024 | South Carolina state | language v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758 record language:state:SC:spanish-lep · status P · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Spanish speakers with limited English | 113,786 ±3,610 people age 5+ | 2020-2024 | South Carolina state | legal-need v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23741886 record legal-need-sc · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
Ad rules that apply
The rules a law firm's ads in South Carolina have to meet, summarized from the official texts. The full rules, with quotes, are on the state page.
| Topic | Status | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Ad filing or review | P primary source | None. The rules set no filing or pre-approval. The lawyer reviews each ad before it goes out and keeps a copy or recording for two years after its last use, with a record of when and where it ran (7.2(b)). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Required content | P primary source | Every ad includes the name and office address of at least one responsible lawyer (7.2(d)) and the city or town of the office where the lawyers doing the work principally practice, or the county if outside a city or town (7.2(h)). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Waiting periods for contact | P primary source | 30 days. A lawyer may not solicit by direct written, recorded or electronic communication, or by in-person, telephone or real-time electronic contact, about a personal injury, wrongful death, accident or disaster unless it happened more than thirty days… official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Claims and results | P primary source | A communication may not create an unjustified expectation about results (7.1(b)) or compare services unless the comparison can be substantiated (7.1(c)). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Paying for referrals | P primary source | A lawyer may not give anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services, except the reasonable cost of permitted ads, the usual charges of a legal service plan or a not-for-profit lawyer referral service that is not itself breaking a rule,… official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Call recording | P primary source | A person who is a party to a call, or who has one party's prior consent, may lawfully record it (subject to the statute's exception for interceptions made to commit a crime or tort). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Texting | P primary source | The South Carolina Telephone Privacy Protection Act covers calls and text or media messages to a SC residence or SC-area-code wireless number; an aggrieved person may sue for actual losses plus $1,000 per violation (up to $5,000 if willful). official source · rules v1.4.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750572 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Drug and device injury ads (state statute) | D default rule | [object Object] |
| Ad filing or review | P primary source | South Carolina: no filing or review of lawyer ads is required. official source · filing v1.2.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721409 · checked 2026-10-25 |
| Paying for referrals | P primary source | Lawyers in different firms may split a fee in proportion to the work each does, or if each takes joint responsibility for the representation. official source · referral v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23747113 · checked 2026-10-27 |
| Limitation period | P primary source | South Carolina, personal injury: 3 years, under S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(5); § 15-3-535, as read in the official code on 2026-10-28. official source · limitations v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23743673 · checked 2026-10-28 |
| Limitation period | S secondary source | South Carolina, product liability: three years, under S.C. Code Ann. 15-3-530(5); 15-3-535, as quoted in South Carolina Court of Appeals, Grillo v. Speedrite Products, Inc., Opinion No. 3168 (2000-05-22). official source · limitations v1.1.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23743673 · checked 2026-10-28 |
Prices and pay (national)
| Measure | Value | Period | Place | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobs in legal services (seasonally adjusted) | 1,249 thousand jobs | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:CES6054110001:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| CPI-U: legal services | 230 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:CUUR0000SEGC01:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| PPI: offices of lawyers | 338 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:PCU541110541110:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
| PPI: civil negligence legal services | 257 index | 2026-09 | United States United States | legal-prices v1.0.0 doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854 record legal-prices:PCU5411105411103:2026-09 · status P · checked 2026-10-28 |
Download and cite
The rows behind this page, with every dataset, version, DOI, record id and check date.
Cite as: Probative Growth, The new-lawyer pipeline by jurisdiction: bar exam pass rates and new admissions, 2025 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721443); Federal civil filings by nature of suit and district, 12-month periods since 2018 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720009); Legal deserts: law offices and lawyers per resident in every U.S. county v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721430); Federal civil cases filed, by county of the plaintiff's residence, case type and year (Federal Judicial Center) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23750628); How long federal civil cases take: outcomes, class actions and pro se share by district, nature of suit and year v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739969); Spanish-speaking demand vs Spanish-speaking lawyer supply, by state and metro v1.1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23656758); Law firm size, solos and receipts, by state: Census SUSB 2022, Nonemployer Statistics 2024 and Economic Census 2022 v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23739997); Law offices, jobs and pay by county, with solo-practice counts: BLS QCEW, Census CBP and Nonemployer Statistics v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23721415); Lawyer, paralegal and legal-staff pay by state and metro (BLS OEWS) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734840); Legal need by county: who may need a lawyer, from the American Community Survey v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23741886); Legal-services prices and jobs, monthly (BLS CPI, PPI and CES) v1.0.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23734854); Mass-tort docket tracker, federal MDL pending actions by month since 2019 v1.1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.23720737); CC BY 4.0. https://probativegrowth.com/markets/south-carolina/mass-tort/
Use it in your AI tool
The same answers come from our free MCP server for AI assistants (no account): https://probativegrowth.com/mcp/markets
How this page is built
Each figure is copied from one record of the dataset named with it, joined to this state and practice through the open practice and place crosswalk. Nothing is estimated. Methods, inputs and limits.