Get my free review

Data · FTC reports

FTC fraud, identity-theft and imposter-scam reports, by state

How many fraud, identity-theft and imposter-scam reports reach the Federal Trade Commission from every state, and how each state compares per 100,000 people. Counts only, from the FTC's own Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book.

Checked October 27, 2026 · CC BY 4.0 · Not legal advice

What is in this dataset?

Reports that consumers made to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's Consumer Sentinel Network in 2024, by state, DC and Puerto Rico, from the FTC's Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. Four records per jurisdiction: fraud and other reports and identity theft reports (each with the count, the rate per 100,000 people and the FTC's rank among the 50 states), imposter-scam reports (the share of the state's reports that the FTC prints, with a count and a rate derived from it, flagged as rounded) and fraud reports with the share reporting a loss, the total dollars reported lost and the median loss. Four national records give the whole country. A report is what a consumer or partner told the FTC, not a finding; the state tables leave out reports from state-specific data contributors and reports with no state.

Use it to see how many fraud, identity-theft and imposter-scam reports each state's consumers send the FTC, and how a state compares per 100,000 people, before you plan consumer-protection or fraud-recovery marketing. Look up your state: the records give each count, rate and rank as the FTC prints them. The imposter-scam count is derived from a whole percent, so it is a rounded estimate and is flagged. A firm weighing a new fraud-recovery or identity-theft page can rank the states it is licensed in by reports per resident: a high rate with a small population can mean a crowded field of victims and few firms speaking to them, while the imposter-scam share hints at which story to lead the page with.

Records
212
Look up by
53
state
Primary source
212

The letters are explained in what P, S, D and U mean.

Where does the data come from?

The FTC's Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book is read from the FTC's PDF by machine in layout mode: the two State Rankings tables, one page per state, Appendix C and the national tables. Counts stay exactly as the FTC prints them. The imposter-scam count is the printed whole-percent share times the state's reports (fraud and other plus identity theft, a base checked against the identity-theft share on every page), flagged noise with its margin. A release gate checks that the ranks reproduce from the rates, that each state page prints the table's counts and ranks, that the two tables imply one population, that Appendix C losses match each page, and that the states add up to no more than the country.

Period covered
January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024
Places
The whole US and states
How often we refresh it
Once a year
The source's next release
March 2027
Records read
October 27, 2026

Official sources

The sources the records cite most

What does a record look like?

  • In 2024, Texas consumers made 462,667 fraud and other reports to the FTC, 1,561 per 100,000 people, ranked 6 of 50 states by reports per 100,000 people.

    Status P · checked October 27, 2026 · source: FTC, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024

  • In 2024, California consumers made 506,727 fraud and other reports to the FTC, 1,291 per 100,000 people, ranked 17 of 50 states by reports per 100,000 people.

    Status P · checked October 27, 2026 · source: FTC, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024

  • In 2024, New York consumers made 278,662 fraud and other reports to the FTC, 1,402 per 100,000 people, ranked 13 of 50 states by reports per 100,000 people.

    Status P · checked October 27, 2026 · source: FTC, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024

  • In 2024, Florida consumers made 474,314 fraud and other reports to the FTC, 2,163 per 100,000 people, ranked 1 of 50 states by reports per 100,000 people.

    Status P · checked October 27, 2026 · source: FTC, Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024

The full records add the dates, the quoted source text and every field in the CSV and JSON files below.

What each of the 12 main columns means
measure
fraud-other, identity-theft, imposter-scams or fraud-losses
measureLabel
The measure in plain words
year
The calendar year the reports were made (the Data Book year)
value
Reports (the count as the FTC prints it, except imposter-scams, which is derived); empty for imposter-scams when the FTC prints no share for the state (flags.suppressed)
per100k
Reports per 100,000 people as the FTC prints it (fraud-other, identity-theft), or derived (imposter-scams)
rank
The FTC's rank among the 50 states by reports per 100,000 people; empty for DC, Puerto Rico and the country
sharePct
imposter-scams: the whole percent of the state's reports that the FTC prints for imposter scams
topTenPosition
imposter-scams: its place in the state's top ten report categories as the FTC lists them
derived
true when value and per100k come from a printed percent (rounded, flags.noise); flags.moe is the margin in reports
pctReportingLoss
fraud-losses: percent of fraud reports that said money was lost
totalLossUsd
fraud-losses: dollars reported lost, as the FTC prints in Appendix C
medianLossUsd
fraud-losses: median dollar loss among reports with a loss

How do I use it in my own tools?

sentinel_lookup
For one state, DC, Puerto Rico (two-letter code) or US: the FTC Consumer Sentinel reports in the Data Book year for fraud and other reports, identity theft, imposter scams (derived from the printed share, flagged) and fraud losses, with the rate per 100,000 people and the FTC's rank among the 50 states.
sentinel_compare
FTC Consumer Sentinel reports side by side for up to 10 states, DC, Puerto Rico (two-letter codes) or US, with the rate per 100,000 people and the rank.
sentinel_search
Report records whose text matches the words given, such as a state name, "imposter scams", "identity theft" or "fraud losses".

How to cite this dataset

You can reuse, adapt and republish this data, including commercially, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (CC BY 4.0). The only condition is that you credit Probative and link to the source.

Version
1.0.0, released October 28, 2026
Every version
10.5281/zenodo.23741875 (always points to the newest)
License
CC BY 4.0

Download the data

Free, no email or login. The files are hosted on this site and Zenodo, a public research archive.

Suggested citation

Probative. (2026). FTC Consumer Sentinel reports by state: fraud, identity theft and imposter scams, 2024 Data Book (Version 1.0.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23741876

Credit line for a chart, table or article

Source: Probative, FTC Consumer Sentinel reports by state: fraud, identity theft and imposter scams, 2024 Data Book, version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23741876, licensed CC BY 4.0.

Add to a reference manager (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote)

Not legal advice. These are counts of reports made to the FTC, kept for marketing planning. A report is a consumer's account, not a finding that fraud happened, and the state tables leave out reports from state-specific data contributors. Deadlines and rights are for your own counsel.

What are the limits?

  • A report is what a consumer told the FTC. It is not a finding that fraud happened.
  • The FTC prints imposter scams only as a whole percent of a state's reports, so the imposter-scam count and rate here are derived from it. They are rounded and flagged, never presented as exact.
  • Reports from state-specific data contributors and reports with no state are left out of the state tables, so states add up to less than the country.
  • Fraud-loss figures are the amounts consumers said they lost. They are self-reported and unverified.
  • Reports reflect who knows to report, not only how much fraud there is. A higher rate can mean more reporting.
  • Records older than 500 days since their last check are marked stale in the files until we re-check them. Every confirmed error we fix is listed in the data corrections log.

Found a wrong value? Report an error with the record id and the source that shows the right value.

Running a firm? You don’t need the raw data: we handle your state’s ad rules for you. See where your firm stands first.

The study built on this data: FTC fraud and imposter-scam reports by state.

Published by Probative Growth, a marketing agency for law firms. See our services and pricing.

Free

Get your free review.

Send us your firm’s website. Probative Growth records a 90-second video of what clients see when they look you up, and emails it with a one-page summary within 2 business days. No logins, no call needed.

Not sure where to start? Answer 7 questions Ready to talk? Talk to us

Your free review: It covers your Google listing, website, phone and ads, from public information.

Step 2 of 2. Where should we send the video for your site?

We use this to send your video and to reply to you.

We use what you send to reply and to send a few short follow-up emails (unsubscribe any time). To learn which of our ads work, we tell Google, Microsoft and Meta that a request came in, with the ad you clicked (if any) and a hashed copy of your email and phone (a code the platforms can still match to you), never your message. Never sold, never added to lists. Global Privacy Control or an email to us turns this off. By sending this form you agree to our privacy policy.

See every price